An 'exit poll' strategy?

We've been reading the analysis, listening to the broadcasts, and trying to put two and two and two together (yeah, that's supposed to be six) and a very weird idea has planted itself in the brain about the Exit Poll problem Tuesday. We're gonna lay out a few facts and see if they make sense to anyone else.

1. The exit poll data was bought and paid for by the MSM, including Fox (who we like to think is trustworthy) and the Associated Press (an outfit we know is no longer trustworthy). Yet the upshot of it is that they received very BAD data, made a fool of themselves for several hours and it took them completely off of their game, such as it is.

What are the odds they were in on the fix? Not good. That's what we think.

2. The Kerry Campaign benefitted initially from the spin generated by the BAD data. Yet in the end it hurt the campaign because DNC and Kerry shot-callers euphorically decided to call off the litigation dogs of war about 4 or 5 p.m. Not necessary if you're going to win big. We have no idea how many Move-Oniacs were going to try to float the vote with provisional ballots and who were called off. By the time the first returns began to return the Dems to reality, it was too late to adjust, and shocked libs and lefties in the western half of America may have had their enthusiasm dampened just a bit. Yeah, it's true that conservative/GOP voters were worried at first, but between Rush, Hannity and Ingraham rallying the faithful with cries of "courage" and "false info" the Bush base did not melt away. The question thus being: If Kerry/DNC knew the data was false, why buy into it? Why go euphoric? It doesn't make sense, even for them.

The odds of Kerry/DNC involvement? Very long.

3. The polling firm, still protesting its innocence, had more to lose by fudging the numbers than playing it straight. Seems likely it got played, big time.

4. The financial markets went south very substantially (a profit making event?) about an hour before Wall Street closed shop. No time to get correct data in the system to reverse the tide. Thus the timing of the leaked exit polling material was everything. Was this market manipulation and, if so, who would stand to benefit from such a thing?

5. There were indications over the last couple of weeks of market manipulation at Tradesports, according to some of the pajamahadeen who monitor such things. If in fact this was the case, was it related?

6. Anectdotal reports began surfacing today of MoveOn-type people who were hired to go to the exact polling locations where Exit Poll data were being extracted, cast their votes (or pretend to do so) and then related their "voting patterns" to the monitors. If this is true, the system was being "gamed" from the outside (with maybe a little bit of inside help, but it would not necessarily have to be a major player on the inside. Just someone who knew which precincts were in play for exit polling.)

Which leads to a couple of questions and sneaking suspicion or two. Who is well known for his prowess at manipulating currency markets?

George Soros.

Who bought and paid for MoveOn.org during this campaign cycle?

George Soros.

Who is rich enough to "buy" the right people in the right places?

George Soros, among others.

We've seen pseudo-sympathy for Soros in several places. "What did he get out of his $23.5 million?" one asked. Others are sure he's broken-hearted over the outcome.

Count us as skeptical. Soros is a crafty, tough old sonofaEuropean who may well have decided to TRY to tip the election to a liberal, but in reality loves money even more than liberalism. In his worldview, we speculate, a George Soros survives no matter the outcome of the election. Especially if he is making uncounted millions playing the markets while manipulating the message, the media and the masses. This is our theory.

Okay, we admit it's paranoia par excellence. But even paranoids are right once in awhile.

And what if he's working hand-in-velvet glove with Bill and Hillary Clinton? You didn't really think they were going to take a Kerry-Edwards presidency lying down (and certainly not together), did you?